Lund University is celebrating 350 years. Read more on lunduniversity.lu.se

Menu

Javascript is not activated in your browser. This website needs javascript activated to work properly.
You are here

What you need is what you eat? Prey selection by the bat Myotis daubentonii.

Author:
  • Eero J Vesterinen
  • Lasse Ruokolainen
  • Niklas Wahlberg
  • Carlos Peña
  • Tomas Roslin
  • Veronika N Laine
  • Ville Vasko
  • Ilari E Sääksjärvi
  • Kai Norrdahl
  • Thomas M Lilley
Publishing year: 2016-02-03
Language: English
Pages: 1581-1594
Publication/Series: Molecular Ecology
Volume: 25
Document type: Journal article
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Abstract english

Optimal foraging theory predicts that predators are selective when faced with abundant prey, but become less picky when prey gets sparse. Insectivorous bats in temperate regions are faced with the challenge of building up fat reserves vital for hibernation during a period of decreasing arthropod abundances. According to optimal foraging theory, pre-hibernating bats should adopt a less selective feeding behavior - yet empirical studies have revealed many apparently generalized species to be composed of specialist individuals. Targeting the diet of the bat Myotis daubentonii, we used a combination of molecular techniques to test for seasonal changes in prey selectivity and individual-level variation in prey preferences. DNA metabarcoding was used to characterise both the prey contents of bat droppings and the insect community available as prey. To test for dietary differences among M. daubentonii individuals, we used ten microsatellite loci to assign droppings to individual bats. The comparison between consumed and available prey revealed a preference for certain prey items regardless of availability. Non-biting midges (Chironomidae) remained the most highly consumed prey at all times, despite a significant increase in the availability of black-flies (Simuliidae) towards the end of the season. The bats sampled showed no evidence of individual specialization in dietary preferences. Overall, our approach offers little support for optimal foraging theory. Thus, it shows how novel combinations of genetic markers can be used to test general theory, targeting patterns at both the level of prey communities and individual predators. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Ecology

Other

Published
  • ISSN: 0962-1083
Professor Niklas Wahlberg at the unit of Biodiversity, Lund University.
E-mail: niklas [dot] wahlberg [at] biol [dot] lu [dot] se

Professor

Biodiversity

+46 46 222 31 02

E-E335

Sölvegatan 37, Lund

50

Museum director

Biological Museum

+46 46 222 31 02

E-E335

Sölvegatan 37, Lund

50