Menu

Javascript is not activated in your browser. This website needs javascript activated to work properly.
You are here

Semi-natural grasslands as population sources for pollinating insects in agricultural landscapes

Author:
  • Erik Öckinger
  • Henrik Smith
Publishing year: 2007
Language: English
Pages: 50-59
Publication/Series: Journal of Applied Ecology
Volume: 44
Issue: 1
Document type: Journal article
Publisher: Wiley Online Library

Abstract english

1. In intensively farmed agricultural landscapes, many species are confined to very small uncultivated areas such as field margins. However, it has been suggested that these small habitat elements cannot support viable populations of all the species observed there. Instead, species richness and abundance in these small habitat fragments may, at least partly, be dependent on dispersal from larger semi-natural grassland fragments.2. We tested this hypothesis for butterflies and bumble bees in 12 independent landscapes in a region of intense agriculture in southern Sweden. In each landscape we surveyed abundance and species richness in one semi-natural grassland, one linear habitat (uncultivated field margin) adjacent to this (called proximate) and one similar linear habitat (called distant) situated at least 1000 m from the semi-natural grassland patch.3. Both species richness and density (individuals per unit area) of butterflies and bumble bees were significantly higher in proximate linear habitats than in distant ones. Moreover, butterfly species richness was higher for a given area in grasslands than in any of the linear habitat types. Butterfly density in grasslands did not differ from that in proximate linear habitats but was lower in distant linear habitats. The effect of isolation on density was stronger for less mobile butterfly species. For bumble bees there was no difference in species richness between grasslands and proximate linear habitats.4. For at least some of the butterfly species even these relatively small fragments of semi-natural grasslands act as population sources from which individuals disperse to the surrounding habitats and thereby contribute to higher densities and species richness in adjacent areas. For bumble bees, it is more likely that the grasslands contain a higher density of nests than the surrounding intensively cultivated landscape, and that the density of foraging bumble bees decreases with increasing distance from the nest.5. Synthesis and application. Habitat fragmentation and intensified agricultural practices are considered to be a threat against services provided by pollinators. In order to sustain the abundance and diversity of insect pollinators in intensively farmed agricultural landscapes, we suggest that preservation of the remaining semi-natural grasslands or re-creation of flower-rich grasslands is essential.

Keywords

  • Ecology

Other

Published
  • ISSN: 1365-2664
Henrik Smith
E-mail: henrik [dot] smith [at] biol [dot] lu [dot] se

Director

Centre for Environmental and Climate Research (CEC)

+46 46 222 93 79

+46 70 978 20 56

C313

Sölvegatan 37, Lund

50

Professor

Biodiversity

+46 46 222 93 79

+46 70 978 20 56

E-C313

50

Head of department

Centre for Environmental and Climate Research (CEC)

Sölvegatan 37, Lund

50

Coordinator

Lund university sustainability forum

+46 46 222 93 79

+46 70 978 20 56

C 313

Sölvegatan 37, Lund

50

Research group

Biodiversity and Conservation Science

Projects

Doctoral students and postdocs

PhD students, main supervisor

PhD students, assistant supervisor

Postdocs

Downloads & links

Henrik Smith