Menu

Javascript is not activated in your browser. This website needs javascript activated to work properly.
You are here

Splitting or synonymizing – genus concept and taxonomy exemplified by the Parmeliaceae in the Nordic region.

Author:
  • Arne Thell
  • Ingvar Kärnefelt
  • Mark R. D. Seaward
Publishing year: 2018-06-13
Language: English
Pages: 130-137
Publication/Series: Graphis Scripta
Volume: 30
Issue: 6
Document type: Journal article
Publisher: Nordisk lichenologisk förening, NLF

Abstract english

The current use of a 30 million year dateline for accepting genera in the Parmeliaceae is evaluated. Its value is doubtful since evolution obviously went quicker in some lichen groups compared with others. Parallel evolution is also very common among lichens. Polyphyletic genera should always be split, while sister groups may remain split or be combined after considering non-molecular characters. Researchers dealing with the same groups should consult each other in an endeavour to achieve consensus. The most recent changes in taxonomy in the Nordic Parmeliaceae relate to the cetrarioid group, the last large clade to be revised. The division into two large genera, Cetraria and Nephromopsis, is supported, with a recommendation to retain Masonhalea due to its unique non-molecular characters. Three cases of parallel evolution in Cetraria and Nephromopsis are illustrated. Synonymization of Gowardia with Alectoria is supported, whereas synonymization of the parasitic genera Raesaenenia and Nesolechia with Protousnea and Punctelia respectively seems hardly necessary. Segregation of Montanelia from Melanelia is strongly supported, in contrast to the morphologically similar sister groups of Usnea, Dolochousnea and Eumitria, being recognised as separate genera.
The current use of a 30 million year dateline for accepting genera in the Parmeliaceae is evaluated. Its value is doubtful since evolution obviously went quicker in some lichen groups compared with others. Parallel evolution is also very common among lichens. Polyphyletic genera should always be split, while sister groups may remain split or be combined after considering non-molecular characters. Researchers dealing with the same groups should consult each other in an endeavour to achieve consensus. The most recent changes in taxonomy in the Nordic Parmeliaceae relate to the cetrarioid group, the last large clade to be revised. The division into two large genera, Cetraria and Nephromopsis, is supported, with a recommendation to retain Masonhalea due to its unique non-molecular characters. Three cases of parallel evolution in Cetraria and Nephromopsis are illustrated. Synonymization of Gowardia with Alectoria is supported, whereas synonymization of the parasitic genera Raesaenenia and Nesolechia with Protousnea and Punctelia respectively seems hardly necessary. Segregation of Montanelia from Melanelia is strongly supported, in contrast to the morphologically similar sister groups of Usnea, Dolochousnea and Eumitria, being recognised as separate genera.

Keywords

  • Botany

Other

Published
  • ISSN: 0901-7593
Arne Thell
E-mail: arne [dot] thell [at] biol [dot] lu [dot] se

Museum curator

Botanical collections

+46 46 222 89 78

311

62

Biological Museum

Research group

Plant Biology

Collaboration

Download & links

CV (pdf; 64 kB)

Parmeliaceae - Nordic Lichen Flora

Betonica officinalis
Betonica officinalis

Parmelia ernstiae
Parmelia ernstiae