Lund University is celebrating 350 years. Read more on lunduniversity.lu.se

Menu

Javascript is not activated in your browser. This website needs javascript activated to work properly.
You are here

Cause and effect in biology revisited: Is Mayr’s proximate-ultimate dichotomy still useful?

Author:
  • Kevin Laland
  • Kim Sterelny
  • John Odling-Smee
  • William Hoppitt
  • Tobias Uller
Publishing year: 2011
Language: English
Pages: 1512-1516
Publication/Series: Science
Volume: 334
Issue: 6062
Document type: Journal article
Publisher: The American Association for the Advancement of Science

Abstract english

Fifty years ago, Ernst Mayr published a hugely influential paper on the nature of causation in biology, in which he distinguished between proximate and ultimate causes. Mayr equated proximate causation with immediate factors (for example, physiology) and ultimate causation with evolutionary explanations (for example, natural selection). He argued that proximate and ultimate causes addressed different questions and were not alternatives. Mayr's account of causation remains widely accepted today, with both positive and negative ramifications. Several current debates in biology (for example, over evolution and development, niche construction, cooperation, and the evolution of language) are linked by a common axis of acceptance/rejection of Mayr's model of causation. We argue that Mayr's formulation has acted to stabilize the dominant evolutionary paradigm against change but may now hamper progress in the biological sciences

Keywords

  • Biological Sciences

Other

Published
  • ISSN: 1095-9203